Skip to content

ARM: shmobile: sh-eth pins in DT for armadillo800eva

Simon Horman linux-arm-kernel linux-devicetree linux-sh netdev 1 version New

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

  1. v1 Latest0 of 3 patches 0 repliesNew

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

None of the 3 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [PATCH 0/3] ARM: shmobile: sh-eth pins in DT for armadillo800eva
Quoted 17 lines · Guennadi Liakhovetski

Hi Simon

Quoted 4 lines · Simon Horman
Quoted 2 lines · Guennadi Liakhovetski

This patch series gets rid of gpio_request()-style ethernet pin configuration on armadillo800eva in reference implementation.

Quoted 8 lines

Hi Guennadi,

these changes seem to be reasonable to me.

Are there any dependencies for the sh_eth patch?
I assume this will be handled by David Miller through the net-next tree. Are there any dependencies? The last time I checked the DT bindings for sh_eth had not been merged.

Quoted 6 lines

Obviously, it can only be applied, if the Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sh_ether.txt file and the sh_eth_parse_dt() function exist. Also, if there are no objections against the new phy-reset-gpios DT property. Otherwise there are no dependencies - as long as the phy-reset-gpios property isn't found in DT, the patch doesn't affect the driver.

Thanks, I'm slightly concerned that the other patch(es) relating to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sh_ether.txt have gone missing in action.

Do you have an interest in chasing them down or would you like me to?

Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 3 lines

For the remaining two patches, which I assume will go through my renesas tree:
* Are there any dependencies that aren't satisfied by the of-intc branch?

AFAICS, that your branch doesn't contain Laurent's pinctrl patches, which are needed for patch 1 to apply and for patch 3 to make sense. My earlier MMC DT / pinctrl patches aren't required for these patches to function, but these patches won't apply cleanly without them, since they touch the same code fragments. So, it would be easier to merge them in the order of submission.

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line

* Could you get some Acks. At least from Laurent?

Sure, let's give reviewers some more time :)

Indeed.

Laurent, if there are patches ready for me to take into the renesas tree please let me know. I'm reluctant to add any more pinmux changes for 3.9. But if a topic branch would help let me know.