Skip to content

support Hisilicon SoC

Olof Johansson linux-arm-kernel 3 versions – New

Get series with b4
b4 am CAOesGMgNXjkYSbLhUk6sbusJ_GFroSRgZTW1SDX6QyKBwigcpg@mail.gmail.com

Versions newest first · linked by author and title

  1. v4 Latest posting 3/30 of 7 patches 0 repliesNew
  2. v4 posting 2/30 of 7 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
  3. v4 posting 1/32 of 7 patches 0 repliesSuperseded

Patches in v4 posting 3/3 No applies recorded yet

None of the 7 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v4 yet.

Read the v4 thread

Cover letter [PATCH v4 0/7] support Hisilicon SoC
Quoted 31 lines · Mike Turquette

Quoting Olof Johansson (2013-06-13 12:58:01)

Quoted 30 lines · Heiko St?bner
Quoted 28 lines

Am Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2013, 22:01:42 schrieb Olof Johansson:

Quoted 17 lines · Haojian Zhuang
Quoted 7 lines

Changelog:
v4:
1. Add clk gate with HIWORD mask for Rockchip.
2. Update comments and code of HIWORD flags for mux/divider.
3. Append a mux without HIWORD mask in Hisilicon 3620.
4. Fix the pinmux setting in Hi4511.

Quoted 8 lines

v3:
1. Use clk_register_mux_table().

v2:
1. Reuse mux & divider driver. So append CLK_MUX_HIWORD_MASK & CLK_DIVIDER_HIWORD_MASK for Hi3620 SoC.
2. Fix system timer running too fast because wrong divider is choosen.
3. Remove .init_irq in DT machine descriptor.

Quoted 6 lines

Hi,

I had some comments on the last two patches. I also haven't seen any acks from Mike on any of the clock changes, which would be needed before we can pick them up. He might want to merge them into his tree as well, if so we'll have to setup a shared branch.

Also, if anything unexpected happens to the main hisilicon support, could you or Mike pick up the HIWORD_MASK patches anyway (if they are acceptable), because they're needed for the Rockchip stuff too.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Ok, that definitely means a topic branch would be a good idea. Mike, can you collect these branches on a topic that we can just pull in as a dependency then, please? Assuming you're happy with them, of course.

Do you mean s/branches/patches/ ?

Yes, sorry -- please collect the patches on a stable topic branch (i.e. not part of all of clk-next)

Quoted 5 lines

I've pulled patches #1-#3 into clk-next, but I'd like a couple of rounds through linux-next before I state that a given commit is stable. So maybe early next week (it's still Saturday for me) I'll push out a clk-for-3.11 branch that will have the hiword patches in them and the sha1's will not change.

Ok. We can pull in the larger clk-next branch if you are 100% confident that you won't have to rebase it. If you think there's even a minimal chance you will have to do so, it's better to do these on just a standalone branch that can still be stable commits. Either way works for us though.

-Olof