MBus DT binding: A new hope
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v5 Latest0 of 12 patches 0 repliesNew
Patches in v5 No applies recorded yet
None of the 12 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v5 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH v5 00/12] MBus DT binding: A new hope
Quoted 5 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 3 lines · Ezequiel Garcia
Personally, I can't see any disadvantage, and the binding looks much cleaner now. But of course I can be wrong, and I'm open to discussion.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
There's another pending issue. Arnd Bergmann has required to add a property to specify the available space within the CPU address space for decoding windows. This property would allow to support fully dynamic mbus window allocation.
I wonder if this range is implied - eg it is address space not covered by the memory node or any mbus ranges? Is there a situation where that is not sufficient?
I think it's sufficient, yes. It feels odd to have the mbus code rely on the contents of the memory node for that, but it would work.
Arnd