Skip to content

Renesas ARM based SoC pinmux updates for v3.12

Olof Johansson linux-arm-kernel linux-sh 3 versions – New

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first · linked by author and title

  1. v2 Latest posting 2/20 of 19 patches 0 repliesNew
  2. v2 posting 1/20 of 19 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
  3. v10 of 5 patches 0 repliesSuperseded

Patches in v2 posting 2/2 No applies recorded yet

None of the 19 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v2 yet.

Read the v2 thread

Cover letter [GIT 00/19 v2] Renesas ARM based SoC pinmux updates for v3.12
Quoted 33 lines · Simon Horman
Quoted 32 lines · Olof Johansson
Quoted 9 lines · Simon Horman

Hi Olof, Hi Arnd,

please consider the following pinmux updates for v3.12.

Difference with v1 of this pull-request:
* Remove bogus i2c portions of the first patch of the series.
* Correct addressing mode used in dts of the first patch of the series.
* Removal of egg from face: wip

Quoted 7 lines

The following changes since commit ad81f0545ef01ea651886dddac4bef6cec930092:

Linux 3.11-rc1 (2013-07-14 15:18:27 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/horms/renesas.git tags/renesas-pinmux-for-v3.12

Pulled, but I noticed this. Can you please follow up with bindings revisit in time for 3.12 final (i.e. if we need to take it after merge window that's probably OK):

        pfc: pfc at e6060000 {                                                     
                compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7790";                             
                reg = <0 0xe6060000 0 0x250>;                                   
                #gpio-range-cells = <3>;                                        
        };                                                                      
                                                                                                               
        sdhi0: sdhi at ee100000 {                                                  
                compatible = "renesas,r8a7790-sdhi";
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line

I.e. different ordering on the compatible values looks a bit uncoordinated.

Can I confirm that you are referring to the fact that assume you mean that "-sdhi" follows "r8a7790" whereas "pfc-" precedes "r8a7790"?

If so, I'll work with Laurent and Guennadi (both CCed, both on vacation), and Magnus to resolve this inconsistency.

Yes, exactly. Some platforms use <vendor>,<soc>-<ip>, others <vendor>,<ip>-<soc>. I don't care which way is used, but it would be good if everybody used the same convention to make it easier for developers.

Preference for direction is something I leave up to the device tree maintainers to declare. ;-)

-Olof

Read the cover letter in its thread