clk: max77686: Clock provider implementation fixes
Get series with b4
b4 am 20140108215432.27803.3120@quantumVersions newest first · linked by author and title
- v2 Latest posting 5/50 of 8 patches 0 repliesNew
- v2 posting 4/50 of 8 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
- v2 posting 3/50 of 8 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
Earlier versions · 2
| Version | Posted | Patches | Replies | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v2 posting 2/5 | 0 of 8 patches | 0 replies | Superseded | |
| v2 posting 1/5 | 0 of 8 patches | 0 replies | Superseded |
Patches in v2 posting 5/5 No applies recorded yet
None of the 8 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v2 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH v2 0/8] clk: max77686: Clock provider implementation fixes
Quoting Tomasz Figa (2014-01-08 10:04:57)
Quoted 10 lines · On Wednesday 08 of January 2014 09:59:39 Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoted 8 lines
Quoting Lee Jones (2014-01-08 09:15:44)
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I believe Lee has already applied this one, but in future, to avoid such confusion, if it's more convenient for you, I can send you any clock series as pull requests.
Me? I haven't applied any clk patches.
I have taken patches 1-7 into clk-next just now.
Quoted 8 lines
Thanks.
Quoted 2 lines
I can take patch #8 as
well but it would probably be better to send it through arm-soc?Hmm, patch 8 is trivial enough to not cause any merge conflicts, but since it's unlikely that any users depending on introduced changes will show up for 3.14 it shouldn't really matter which tree it goes through...
In the absence of any strong opinion on the topic I have taken patch #8 into clk-next for 3.14.
Regards,
Mike
Quoted 4 lines
Best regards,
Tomasz