Skip to content

timers: internal_add_timer() should update ->next_timer if ->active_timers == 0

Oleg Nesterov lkml 1 version In review

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

  1. v1 Latest1 patch 2 repliesIn review

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

#Subject and filesSizeRepliesApplied
1/1timers: internal_add_timer() should update ->next_timer if ->active_timers == 0kernel/timer.c+2 -22 replies

Reviews trailers per patch

The patch has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.

PatchSteven Rostedt
1/1R-b

Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [PATCH 0/1] timers: internal_add_timer() should update ->next_timer if ->active_timers == 0
Quoted 4 lines · Oleg Nesterov

This is funny, but I already have the same change for ->next_timer, if we add this optimization perhaps that trivial patch makes sense too.

Please see 1/1, it should not conflict with your changes.

Oleg.