i.MX6 PCIe binding change and MSI support
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest4 of 8 patches 0 repliesNew
4 of 8 patches are in this archive. The cover letter announces 8.
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/8 | ARM: imx6q-clk: parent lvds_gate from lvds_sel | +0 | 0 replies | |
| 2/8 | PCI: designware: split Exynos and i.MX bindings | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 2/8 | PCI: designware: split Exynos and i.MX bindings | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 2/8 | PCI: designware: split Exynos and i.MX bindings | +0 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
1 of 4 patches has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by of their own; the series has one for all of them.
| Patch | Marek Vasut |
|---|---|
| Series | R-b |
| 1/8 | R-b |
| 2/8 | |
| 2/8 | |
| 2/8 |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/8] i.MX6 PCIe binding change and MSI support
Quoted 6 lines · Lucas Stach
While working on MSI support for the i.MX6 PCIe host driver it has been discovered that the binding for this host controller is broken in many ways (refer to the patch descriptions for more info) and was introduced without proper discussion about what should/should not be in the binding.
Quoted 8 lines
This series fixes this and minimizes the difference of the i.MX6 binding to the common designware PCIe binding. I'm aware that this is a quite radical change, but I think it's justified to do this as long as there aren't many user of the old binding (most of the optional properties in the binding aren't even implemented).
Looking forward to your feedback.
Other but 2/8, which needs further discussion,
Best regards,
Marek Vasut