Skip to content

arm64 crypto roundup

Catalin Marinas linux-arm-kernel linux-crypto 2 versions – In review

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first · linked by author and title

  1. v1 Latest posting 2/20 of 15 patches 3 repliesIn review
  2. v1 posting 1/28 of 15 patches 0 repliesSuperseded

Patches in v1 posting 2/2 No applies recorded yet

None of the 15 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [PATCH resend 00/15] arm64 crypto roundup
Quoted 28 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
Quoted 27 lines · Catalin Marinas
Quoted 14 lines · Ard Biesheuvel

This is a repost of the arm64 crypto patches that I have posted to the LAKML over the past months. They have now been verified on actual hardware (Cortex-A57) so if there are no remaining issues I would like to propose them for 3.16.

Ard Biesheuvel (15):
asm-generic: allow generic unaligned access if the arch supports it
arm64: add abstractions for FPSIMD state manipulation
arm64: defer reloading a task's FPSIMD state to userland resume
arm64: add support for kernel mode NEON in interrupt context arm64/crypto: SHA-1 using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions arm64/crypto: SHA-224/SHA-256 using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions arm64/crypto: GHASH secure hash using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions arm64/crypto: AES using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions

Quoted 8 lines

arm64/crypto: AES in CCM mode using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions
arm64: pull in <asm/simd.h> from asm-generic arm64/crypto: AES-ECB/CBC/CTR/XTS using ARMv8 NEON and Crypto
Extensions
arm64/crypto: add shared macro to test for NEED_RESCHED arm64/crypto: add voluntary preemption to Crypto Extensions SHA1 arm64/crypto: add voluntary preemption to Crypto Extensions SHA2 arm64/crypto: add voluntary preemption to Crypto Extensions GHASH

There are about 5 patches that make sense to me ;) and apart from a few minor comments they look fine.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

There are the other 10 crypto patches that are beyond my knowledge. Do you know anyone who could do a sanity check on them? Are there any tests that would show the correctness of the implementation?

I will re-send the 3 FPSIMD patches separately with your review comments addressed.

Thanks. If you get another acked/reviewed-by tag on the rest of the patches it?s even better (I plan to get the series in for 3.16, after we do some tests internally as well).

Catalin

Read the cover letter in its thread