tracing: instance_rmdir() leaks ftrace_event_file->filter
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest7 patches 13 repliesIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/7 | tracing: instance_rmdir() leaks ftrace_event_file->filterkernel/ | +1 | 2 replies | |
| 2/7 | tracing: kill destroy_preds() and destroy_file_preds()include/ kernel/ kernel/ | +0 | 0 replies | |
| 3/7 | tracing: kill destroy_call_preds()include/ kernel/ kernel/ | +2 | 0 replies | |
| 4/7 | tracing: kill call_filter_disable()kernel/ | +1 | 1 reply | |
| 5/7 | tracing/uprobes: kill the dead TRACE_EVENT_FL_USE_CALL_FILTER logickernel/ | +1 | 2 replies | |
| 6/7 | tracing: kill ftrace_event_call->filesinclude/ | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 7/7 | tracing: change filter_free_subsystem_*() to check ->subsystem rather then ->namekernel/ | +2 | 5 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
1 of 7 patches has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.
| Patch | Srikar Dronamraju |
|---|---|
| 1/7 | |
| 2/7 | |
| 3/7 | |
| 4/7 | |
| 5/7 | A-b |
| 6/7 | |
| 7/7 |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/7] tracing: instance_rmdir() leaks ftrace_event_file->filter
Hello,
Sorry for delay, I was distracted by other problems.
To remind, we discussed the potential uprobes "mix perf/ftrace" changes and found some off-topic problems. Lets start with ->filter fixes/cleanups.
So far I didn't even try to test this series, although it looks simple except perhaps the last patch. I'll try to somehow test this tomorrow, but I do not really now how.
So please review, these patches need acks anyway.
As for 1/7, I added BUG_ON(file->filter) into remove_event_file_dir() before kmem_cache_free() to verify that yes, the leak does exist. Perhaps this patch should go to stable, or at least to v3.16.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And could someone explain me why apply_subsystem_event_filter("0") clears ->filter_string first, then the whole ->filter? It seems that the only thing filter_free_subsystem_preds() should do is filter_disable(), no? IOW, why the patch below (on top of this series) is wrong?
Oleg.
kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c +1 -12
@@ -831,17 +831,6 @@ static int __alloc_preds(struct event_filter *filter, int n_preds)return 0 ; } -static inline void __remove_filter (struct ftrace_event_file *file) -{ -struct ftrace_event_call *call = file->event_call; - -filter_disable (file); -if (call->flags &TRACE_EVENT_FL_USE_CALL_FILTER ) -remove_filter_string (call->filter); -else -remove_filter_string (file->filter); -} -static void filter_free_subsystem_preds (struct event_subsystem *system,struct trace_array *tr) {
@@ -850,7 +839,7 @@ static void filter_free_subsystem_preds(struct event_subsystem *system,list_for_each_entry (file, &tr->events, list) {if (file->system->subsystem != system)continue ; -__remove_filter (file); +filter_disable (file); } }