pinctrl: sunxi: misc improvements for gpio
Get series with b4
b4 am 20140724125750.GY20328@lukatherVersions newest first
- v1 Latest2 patches 0 repliesNew
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/2 | pinctrl: sunxi: use gpiolib API to mark a GPIO used as an IRQ | +0 | 0 replies | |
| 2/2 | pinctrl: sunxi: number gpio ranges starting from 0 | +0 | 0 replies | |
| 2/2 | pinctrl: sunxi: number gpio ranges starting from 0 | +0 | 1 reply |
Reviews trailers per patch
All 3 patches have a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.
| Patch | Maxime Ripard |
|---|---|
| 1/2 | A-b |
| 2/2 | A-b |
| 2/2 | A-b |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: sunxi: misc improvements for gpio
Quoted 11 lines · Linus Walleij
Quoted 3 lines
AFAIK pinctrl pin numbers are device specific, so I'm wondering if we should also number them in terms of offsets, rather than absolute pin numbers. It's more of an asthetic change though. Any thoughts?
Usually I say these pin numbers should try to match what is in the data sheet so it is easy to understand and debug. Sometimes pins are numbered with letters and stuff so they rather have names than numbers, then some artificial numbering is applied, whatever is helpful.
I'm not directly familiar with the sunxi numbering system though...
I'd prefer if we had an absolute number that more or less matches the one in the datasheet.
Maxime
Signature · 10 lines
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140724/ed4c4083/attachment.sig>