x86, fpu: copy_process's FPU paths cleanups
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest4 patches 11 repliesIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/4 | x86, fpu: change __thread_fpu_begin() to use use_eager_fpu()arch/ | +1 | 0 replies | |
| 1/4 | x86, fpu: introduce per-cpu "bool in_kernel_fpu"arch/ arch/ | +11 | 1 reply | |
| 2/4 | x86, fpu: copy_process: avoid fpu_alloc/copy if !used_math()arch/ | +6 | 0 replies | |
| 2/4 | x86, fpu: don't abuse ->has_fpu in __kernel_fpu_begin/endarch/ | +6 | 0 replies | |
| 3/4 | x86, fpu: copy_process: sanitize fpu->last_cpu initializationarch/ | +3 | 0 replies | |
| 3/4 | x86, fpu: irq_fpu_usable: always return true if use_eager_fpu()arch/ | +2 | 0 replies | |
| 4/4 | x86, fpu: shift "fpu_counter = 0" from copy_thread() to arch_dup_task_struct()arch/ arch/ arch/ | +1 | 0 replies | |
| 4/4 | x86, fpu: irq_fpu_usable: kill all checks except !in_kernel_fpuarch/ | +1 | 3 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
None of the 8 patches has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by of their own; the series has one for all of them.
| Patch | Suresh Siddha |
|---|---|
| Series | R-b |
| 1/4 | |
| 1/4 | |
| 2/4 | |
| 2/4 | |
| 3/4 | |
| 3/4 | |
| 4/4 | |
| 4/4 |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/4] x86, fpu: copy_process's FPU paths cleanups
Hello,
Who can review this? And where should I send FPU changes?
And it seems that nobody cares about 2 fixes I sent before. Linus, I understand that you won't take them into v3.17, but perhaps you can ack/nack them explicitly? It seems that nobody can do this.
Oleg.
arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 16 +++++++++------- arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 2 -- arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 1 - 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)