Skip to content

arm64 EFI patches for 3.19

Will Deacon linux-arm-kernel linux-efi 1 version New

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

  1. v1 Latest2 of 10 patches 0 repliesNew

2 of 10 patches are in this archive. The cover letter announces 10.

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

#Subject and filesSizeRepliesApplied
5/10arm64/efi: drop redundant set_bit(EFI_CONFIG_TABLES)+0 -00 replies
10/10arm64: dmi: set DMI string as dump stack arch description+0 -01 reply

Reviews trailers per patch

1 of 2 patches has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.

PatchWill Deacon
5/10A-b
10/10

Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [PATCH 00/10] arm64 EFI patches for 3.19

Hi Ard,

Quoted 10 lines · Ard Biesheuvel

This is a bit of a mixed bag of patches that we would like to see merged for 3.19. Most of them have been posted and discussed on linux-efi and/or LAKML before, and one of them has even been merged and reverted twice.

Patches #1 - #4 are fixes for compliance with the UEFI and PE/COFF specs. No issues are known that require these patches, so there is no reason to pull them into a stable release.

Patches #5 and #6 address minor issues in the arm64 EFI init code.

Quoted 8 lines

Patches #7 - #10 implement DMI/SMBIOS for arm64, both the existing 32-bit version and the upcoming 3.0 version that allows the SMBIOS structure table to reside at a physical offset that cannot be encoded in 32-bits. It also install a 'Hardware: xxx' string that is printed along with oopses and kernel call stack dumps on systems that implement DMI/SMBIOS.

Please refer to the patches themselves for version history. Acks and/or comments appreciated.

It would be helpful for me if you could split this into two series -- one for the arm64 tree and the other for the efi tree. That would also make the dependencies clearer, so I know whether any of the arch bits need to go via Matt.

Cheers,

Will