ARM: mvebu: armada-*: Relicense the device tree under GPLv2+/X11
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest3 of 27 patches 0 repliesNew
3 of 27 patches are in this archive. The cover letter announces 27.
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8/27 | ARM: mvebu: armada-370-xp: Relicense the device tree under GPLv2+/X11 | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 8/27 | ARM: mvebu: armada-370-xp: Relicense the device tree under GPLv2+/X11 | +0 | 9 replies | |
| 8/27 | ARM: mvebu: armada-370-xp: Relicense the device tree under GPLv2+/X11 | +0 | 1 reply |
Reviews trailers per patch
All 3 patches have a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.
| Patch | Simon Guinot |
|---|---|
| 8/27 | A-b |
| 8/27 | A-b |
| 8/27 | A-b |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [PATCH 00/27] ARM: mvebu: armada-*: Relicense the device tree under GPLv2+/X11
Quoted 58 lines · Jason Cooper
Quoted 54 lines · Gregory CLEMENT
Quoted 42 lines · Jason Cooper
Quoted 29 lines · Gregory CLEMENT
Quoted 28 lines · Jason Cooper
Quoted 18 lines · Gregory CLEMENT
Quoted 6 lines · Jason Cooper
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
...Quoted 3 lines
Jason at the end it seems you didn't ack or nack the patches were you were CC. You expressed some concerns about the GPLv2+ move but I don't know if it is something that prevents you to give your acked-by.
Quoted 7 lines
Oops. :) I figured my S-o-B when applying would be sufficient. That decision was before we decided on Andrew applying patches this time around...
For all my dts{i} contributions:
Acked-by Jason Cooper <[email protected]>Thanks :)
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Due to all the merge commits over time and whatnot, it's probably best to put my Ack on all the patches in this series...
OK no problem. By the way, I take care of collecting all the acked-by and once it will be done I will either sent the updated patch set with all the acked-by or maybe just I will create a branch to pull if it is easier to handle.
Ok, that'll be up to Andrew.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Once we have the last few stragglers, and assuming there are no more NAKs, here's what I'd like to do:
Regrettably, we'll have to revert Simon's dts contributions. I say
You missed the email he sent yesterday, finally Simon changed his mind and gave his acked-by.
Indeed, that was for the oneliner change in the
armada-370-xp.dtsifile. I got a bit ahead of myself, but I'm looking towards kirkwood, orion5x, dove, which brings up:Quoted 10 lines
18ba7e4fe51dARM: Kirkwood: add DT support for d2 Network v22d4cd2cafaeaARM: Kirkwood: allow to use netxbig DTSI ford2net_v2DTSa96cc303e42aARM: mvebu: update the SATA compatible string for Armada 370/XPd3dde4df4483ARM: Kirkwood: update Network Space Mini v2 description98d4f2acb91aARM: Kirkwood: DT board setup for CloudBox4ea931e07d77ARM: Kirkwood: fix ns2 gpios by converting to pinctrl7f9871d9d30fARM: kirkwood: DT board setup for Network Space Mini v2ca7d94524ab3ARM: kirkwood: DT board setup for Network Space Lite v2ecee1e47ab42ARM: kirkwood: DT board setup for Network Space v2 and parentsQuoted 2 lines
OK I understand your concern now. About dove and kirkwood, did you notice that some files didn't have any license?
Quoted 7 lines
Yes.
Quoted 1 line
Especially none of the dove files have a license.
Yes, we'll cross that bridge when we get there. I suspect it then falls under the over-arching license of the project. Regardless, we'll still need Acks from all contributors.
Hi Jason,
What is the problem with keeping the LaCie DTS files under GPLv2+ only ?
Simon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141219/35c6aa36/attachment.sig>