Drop more omap3 legacy board-*.c files for v4.2
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest0 of 3 patches 0 repliesNew
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
None of the 3 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/3] Drop more omap3 legacy board-*.c files for v4.2
Quoted 29 lines · Pali Roh?r
Quoted 28 lines · On Tuesday 05 May 2015 07:43:08 Tony Lindgren wrote:
Quoted 11 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 10 lines · On Monday 04 May 2015 13:01:54 Tony Lindgren wrote:
For dropping the remaining omap3 legacy boot support, we still have the following board-*.c files:
BOARD REASON NEEDED board-ldp.c Still used in RMKs boot test system board-omap3logic.c Getting a .dts file for v4.2 board-omap3pandora.c Got a .dts file for v4.1 board-rx51-*.c Needs /proc/atags support for user spaceQuoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
I'm hoping we can drop those for v4.3 merge window, then keep the platform data around for one more merge window in case of reverting needed, then drop the platform data too for v4.4 if no issues needing reverting are found.
Sounds great. Has there been a conclusion about what to do for the rx51
/proc/atagssupport?I believe we just need to enable
/proc/atagsalso for device tree based booting ifCONFIG_ARM_ATAG_DTB_COMPAT. Pali may have more info on that.Then looks like Pali's two patches for showing the revision are still pending in thread "[PATCH v2 0/2] ARM:
/proc/cpuinfo: DT:
Add support for Revision":
Quoted 5 lines
I think I already sent all need patches to ML. But I did not check if you merged them or not. I did not get any new comments for them for a while and right now I do not have time for looking at it again.
Oh OK, do you have link to the /proc/atags patch somewhere?
Maybe Arnd and Nico can pick them up and sort out how we should queue them with Russell?
Quoted 2 lines
I'm against removing board-rx51*.c files before
/proc/cpuinfoand/proc/atagswill be available also for DT booted machine...
I agree those should be supported also for DT based booting.
Quoted 4 lines
Plus there were some other regression for DT booted N900 (not only /proc files), but I do not remember them now. I sent more emails where I wrote it. Maybe it is fixed, maybe not, just search into archive for my emails.
OK
Quoted 2 lines
I can try to find some time at the weekend (this or next) to test 4.1-rc* kernel on N900 and report what is working...
Regards,
Tony