Skip to content

Drop more omap3 legacy board-*.c files for v4.2

Pali Rohár linux-arm-kernel linux-omap 1 version New

Get series with b4
b4 am 201505051839.36882@pali

Versions newest first

  1. v1 Latest0 of 3 patches 0 repliesNew

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

None of the 3 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [PATCH 0/3] Drop more omap3 legacy board-*.c files for v4.2
Quoted 38 lines · On Tuesday 05 May 2015 17:06:38 Tony Lindgren wrote:
Quoted 30 lines · Pali Roh?r
Quoted 29 lines · On Tuesday 05 May 2015 07:43:08 Tony Lindgren wrote:
Quoted 11 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 10 lines · On Monday 04 May 2015 13:01:54 Tony Lindgren wrote:

For dropping the remaining omap3 legacy boot support, we still have the following board-*.c files:

BOARD REASON NEEDED
board-ldp.c Still used in RMKs boot test
system board-omap3logic.c Getting a .dts file
for v4.2 board-omap3pandora.c Got a .dts file for
v4.1 board-rx51-*.c Needs /proc/atags
support for user space

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines

I'm hoping we can drop those for v4.3 merge window, then keep the platform data around for one more merge window in case of reverting needed, then drop the platform data too for v4.4 if no issues needing reverting are found.

Sounds great. Has there been a conclusion about what to do for the rx51 /proc/atags support?

I believe we just need to enable /proc/atags also for device tree based booting if CONFIG_ARM_ATAG_DTB_COMPAT. Pali may have more info on that.

Then looks like Pali's two patches for showing the revision are still pending in thread "[PATCH v2 0/2] ARM:
/proc/cpuinfo: DT: Add support for Revision":

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line

http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg401535.html

I think I already sent all need patches to ML. But I did not check if you merged them or not. I did not get any new comments for them for a while and right now I do not have time for looking at it again.

Quoted 5 lines

Oh OK, do you have link to the /proc/atags patch somewhere?

Maybe Arnd and Nico can pick them up and sort out how we should queue them with Russell?

https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/26/648

Signature · 9 lines
Pali Roh?r
pali.rohar at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150505/47e93981/attachment.sig>

Read the cover letter in its thread