Skip to content

avr32: remove non-generic boards

Hans-Christian Egtvedt u-boot 1 version New

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

  1. v1 Latest0 of 7 patches 0 repliesNew

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

None of the 7 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] avr32: remove non-generic boards
Quoted 9 lines · Andreas Bie?mann

This series deletes avr32-boards that are still using the ancient arch/avr32/lib/board.c code. If one would like his board to stay in u-boot there is a last chance to convert it to generic board _now_. It should be as easy as defining these three values in the board config:

|/* generic board */
|#define CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD
|#define CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F
|#define CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_R

I would prefer this solution over removing all the board support for AVR32 targets in U-Boot.

Sadly, I do not have the time to work with AVR32 in U-Boot.

Quoted 19 lines

The patch 'avr32: delete non generic board favr-32-ezkit' has an checkpatch warning which will not be fixed.

---8<---
0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks for 0002-avr32-delete-non-generic-board-favr-32-ezkit.patch:
warning: arch/avr32/Kconfig,22: please write a paragraph that describes the config symbol fully --->8---

The patch 'avr32: delete non generic board's atstk100{3,4,6}' has a checkpatch warning wich will not be fixed.

---8<---
0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks for 0005-avr32-delete-non-generic-board-s-atstk100-3-4-6.patch:
warning: arch/avr32/Kconfig,13: please write a paragraph that describes the config symbol fully --->8---

Quoted 8 lines

Andreas Bie?mann (7):
avr32: delete non generic board atngw100
avr32: delete non generic board favr-32-ezkit
avr32: delete non generic board hammerhead
avr32: delete non generic board mimc200
avr32: delete non generic board's atstk100{3,4,6}
avr32: take maintainership for atstk1002
avr32: delete ancient board.c

If one were to prioritize, then keeping the atngw100 board would be great.

If the arch/avr32/lib/board.c is a redundant implementation of the generic board.c file, then I am all for removing it and move to using the generic implementation.

<snipp stats>

Signature · 1 line
Hans-Christian Egtvedt

Read the cover letter in its thread