efl bump to 1.15.2
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first · linked by author and title
- v10 Latest2 of 28 patches 0 repliesNew
- v92 of 32 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
2 of 28 patches are in this archive. The cover letter announces 28.
Patches in v10 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/28 | package/efl/libefl: new package | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 1/28 | package/efl/libefl: new package | +0 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v10 yet.
Cover letter [Buildroot] [PATCH v10 00/28] efl bump to 1.15.2
Romain, All,
On 2015-12-19 15:30 +0100, Romain Naour spake thusly:
Quoted 2 lines
Le 18/12/2015 00:11, Thomas Petazzoni a ?crit :
Quoted 1 line · Romain Naour
[--SNIP--]
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
package/efl/libefl: add OpenGLES support
This one I wasn't sure about the "choice"; we had some discussion about it with Yann on IRC.
It's not clear to me when we can really use the full OpenGL support.
I thought that the full OpenGL support was only needed by some specific hardware...
You don't care about the hardware in this case. If there is a full OpenGL provider *and* Xorg is enabled, then you can do full OpenGL. It is the responsibility of the libgl provider to provide hardware access (e.g. mesa3d, nvidia-driver, rpi-userland...)
So, in case my previous comments were not clear, here we go:
- full OpenGL currently requires Xorg and a libgl provider.
Or, put in other words:
- if you have Xorg and you have a libgl provider, then you can do full OpenGL.
So, for EFL, I would add an new entry to the choice:
config BR2_PACKAGE_EFL_GL
bool "opengl"
depends on BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_LIBGL
depends on BR2_PACKAGE_LIBEFL_X_XLIB
comment "opengl support needs X11 support and a libgl provider"
depends on !BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_LIBGL || !BR2_PACKAGE_LIBEFL_X_XLIB
Alternatively, you can go with a select, like:
config BR2_PACKAGE_EFL_GL
bool "opengl"
depends on BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_LIBGL
depends on BR2_PACKAGE_XORG7 # X_XLIB
select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBEFL_X_XLIB
comment "opengl support needs Xorg and a libgl provider"
depends on !BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_LIBGL || !BR2_PACKAGE_XORG7
I think I'd prefer the first solution, but either is OK for me.
But now, if you are not interested in full OpenGL, or you can't test it, or really don't care, just leave it aside. Interested parties can submit that support later.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
Signature · 6 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'