Skip to content

OMAP/pinmux: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag

Tony Lindgren linux-arm-kernel linux-gpio linux-omap 1 version New

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

  1. v1 Latest0 of 3 patches 0 repliesNew

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

None of the 3 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [PATCH 0/3] OMAP/pinmux: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
Quoted 14 lines · Sudeep Holla

Hi Linus,

Quoted 11 lines · Linus Walleij
Quoted 8 lines · Sudeep Holla

pinctrl: single: Use a separate lockdep class
pinctrl: single: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
ARM: OMAP2+: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag

 arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c        |  4 ++--
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c     |  9 ++++-----
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c |  1 +
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Are these patches orthogonal so I can merge the pinctrl patch independently of the OMAP patches if Tony ACKs this?

Thanks for the follow up.
IIUC they are dependent and remember Tony/Grygorii wanted them to be merged together(at-least for bisectibility)

AFAIK this series needs to be kept together to keep things working.

Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 2 lines

If not: should it be merged by me or through ARM SoC/Tony?

I think so.

Quoted 2 lines

Anyways waiting for maintainer feedback, but the above is good to know.

Grygorii was still not sure if this works and he couldn't give it a test. He was traveling and may need more time to get back on this.

He said it does not work so clearly more work is needed.

Regards,

Tony

Read the cover letter in its thread