Skip to content

package/cmake: re-introduce cmake-3.7

Thomas Petazzoni buildroot 1 version New

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

  1. v1 Latest1 of 5 patches 0 repliesNew

1 of 5 patches is in this archive. The cover letter announces 5.

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

#Subject and filesSizeRepliesApplied
1/5core/pkg-cmake: provide our own platform description+0 -05 replies

Reviews trailers per patch

The patch has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.

PatchArnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)
1/5R-b

Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/5] package/cmake: re-introduce cmake-3.7

Hello,

Quoted 6 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle

I don't think it makes much sense to keep the 4 separate patches. The history
shows the authorship of the original bump. Having the 4 separate patches just adds noise to the history. Also, Thomas reported that the libuv dependency introduced by the bump is probably incorrect, so we'd have to revert patch 4/5 and part of patch 2/5 again later on... And if the dependency on libuv *is* needed, then you re-introduce a non-bisectable commit between patch 2/5 and 4/5.

Well, the libuv dependency is incorrect in the sense that ctest doesn't seem to use libuv.

*However*, the libuv dependency is correct in the sense that the CMakeLists.txt checks it, and if not, builds the cmake built-in version of libuv. But since for the target we only build ctest, this whole libuv is not used.

Thomas

Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com