test_rhashtable: don't allocate huge static array
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first · linked by author and title
- v2 Latest4 patches 1 replyIn review
- v14 patches 2 repliesSuperseded
Patches in v2 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/4 | test_rhashtable: don't allocate huge static arraylib/ | +16 | 0 replies | |
| 2/4 | test_rhashtable: don't use global entries variablelib/ | +23 | 0 replies | |
| 3/4 | test_rhashtable: add a check for max_sizelib/ | +41 | 0 replies | |
| 4/4 | test_rhashtable: add test case for rhl_table interfacelib/ | +194 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v2 yet.
Cover letter [net-next v2 0/4] test_rhashtable: don't allocate huge static array
Add a test case for the rhlist interface.
While at it, cleanup current rhashtable test a bit and add a check for max_size support.
No changes since v1, except in last patch.
kbuild robot complained about large onstack allocation caused by struct rhltable when lockdep is enabled.