Skip to content

RFC Per-package host/target directory support

Thomas Petazzoni buildroot 4 versions – New

Get series with b4
b4 am 20180108234109.77518fb7@windsurf

Versions newest first · linked by author and title

  1. v3 RFC Latest posting 2/20 of 15 patches 0 repliesNew
  2. v3 RFC posting 1/215 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
  3. v2 RFC7 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
Earlier versions · 1
VersionPostedPatchesRepliesStatus
v1 RFC0 of 4 patches0 repliesSuperseded

Patches in v3 posting 2/2 No applies recorded yet

None of the 15 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v3 yet.

Read the v3 thread

Cover letter [Buildroot] [RFCv3 00/15] Per-package host/target directory support

Peter, Arnout,

I'd like to apply some of the patches in this series in the current cycle. See below.

Quoted 3 lines · Thomas Petazzoni

Thomas Petazzoni (15):
pkgconf: use relative path to STAGING_DIR instead of absolute path
toolchain: post-pone evaluation of TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN

These two are already applied.

Quoted 3 lines

Makefile, skeleton: move the host skeleton logic to host-skeleton
package
pkg-cmake: install CMake files as part of a package

I'd like to apply those two.

Quoted 1 line

pkg-generic: add .stamp_installed step

This one should instead be just before "core: change host RPATH handling", it is not needed before.

Quoted 7 lines

package/pkg-generic: add the concept of extract dependency package/pkg-generic: handle host-tar as an extract dependency package/pkg-generic: handle host-xz as an extract dependency package/pkg-generic: handle host-lzip as an extract dependency package/pkg-generic: handle host-ccache as a regular dependency package/pkg-generic: handle host-fakedate as a regular dependency
core: kill DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ

And I'd like to apply all those ones, i.e the extract dependency idea and killing DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ.

Are you OK with that ? If so, I'll respin just those ones after taking Yann's feedback into account.

So if you have anything against the approach used in those patches, please speak up ! :-)

Thanks!

Thomas

Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com