Coupled-regulators follow up
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v2 Latest3 patches 0 repliesNew
Patches in v2 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/3 | regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators lockingdrivers/ drivers/ drivers/ +2 more | +317 | 0 replies | |
| 2/3 | regulator: core: Properly handle case where supply is the coupledrivers/ | +17 | 0 replies | |
| 3/3 | regulator: core: Keep regulators-list locked while traversing the listdrivers/ | +8 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v2 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH v2 0/3] Coupled-regulators follow up
Hi,
This is a follow up to [0].
What's changed in v2:
- The "Use ww_mutex for regulators locking" patch compiles now for the drivers that are touching "rdev's" mutex, in a result regulator_[un]lock() functions are public now.
- Added new patch to the series ("Keep regulators-list locked while traversing the list") which further firms regulators locking.
- Changed commit description of the "Change regulator-coupled-max-spread property" patch, saying that it's fine to change the binding because property doesn't have any users yet. That was requested by Rob Herring in the review comment to v1.
[0] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/list/?series=69250
Dmitry Osipenko (3):
regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking
regulator: core: Properly handle case where supply is the couple
regulator: core: Keep regulators-list locked while traversing the list
drivers/regulator/core.c | 425 ++++++++++++++++++++------ drivers/regulator/da9210-regulator.c | 4 +- drivers/regulator/stpmic1_regulator.c | 4 +- drivers/regulator/wm8350-regulator.c | 4 +- include/linux/regulator/driver.h | 6 +- 5 files changed, 339 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1