mm: few refinements to gfp flags documentation
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest2 patches 14 repliesIn review 1 of 2 applied
Patches in v1 1 of 2 applied
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/2 | mm: clarify __GFP_MEMALLOC usageinclude/ | +3 | 12 replies | |
| 2/2 | mm: make it clear that gfp reclaim modifiers are valid only for sleepable allocationsinclude/ | +2 | 2 replies | Applied |
Reviews trailers per patch
1 of 2 patches has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.
| Patch | Paul E. McKenney | David Rientjes | Joel Fernandes (Google) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1/2 | |||
| 2/2 | A-b | A-b | R-b |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes. Scroll the table sideways for all 3 reviewers.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/2] mm: few refinements to gfp flags documentation
Hi,
while discussing [1] it turned out that we could be more explicit in gfp flags documentation. The following two patches do that. There are no functional changes introduced.