Skip to content

RFC fstests specific MAINTAINERS file

Zorro Lang ceph-devel fstests linux-btrfs linux-cifs linux-ext4 linux-f2fs-devel linux-fsdevel linux-nfs linux-unionfs linux-xfs ocfs2-devel 1 version In review

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

  1. v1 RFC Latest5 patches 22 repliesIn review

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

#Subject and filesSizeRepliesApplied
1/5fstests: add MAINTAINERS and get_maintainer.pl filesMAINTAINERS tools/get_maintainer.pl+2732 -06 replies
2/5tools/get_maintainer.pl: remove penguin chiefstools/get_maintainer.pl+1 -440 replies
3/5fstests/MAINTAINERS: add supported mailing listMAINTAINERS+77 -09 replies
4/5fstests/MAINTAINERS: add some specific reviewersMAINTAINERS+6 -05 replies
5/5fstests/MAINTAINERS: add a co-maintainer for btrfs testing partMAINTAINERS+1 -02 replies

Reviews trailers per patch

3 of 5 patches have a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.

PatchDarrick J. WongSteven FrenchAmir GoldsteinChristian BraunerJan KaraXiubo LiChao YuDavid Sterba
1/5
2/5
3/5R-b R-b A-b A-b A-b A-b
4/5R-b A-b A-b
5/5A-b

Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes. Scroll the table sideways for all 8 reviewers.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [RFC PATCH 0/5] fstests specific MAINTAINERS file

I think I might be mad to include that many mailing lists in this patchset...

As I explained in [PATCH 1/5], fstests covers more and more fs testing thing, so we always get help from fs specific mailing list, due to they learn about their features and bugs more. Besides that, some folks help to review patches (relevant with them) more often. So I'd like to bring in the similar way of linux/MAINTAINERS, records fs relevant mailing lists, reviewers or supporters (or call co-maintainers). To recognize the contribution from them, and help more users to know who or what mailing list can be added in CC list of a patch.

(The MAINTAINERS and get_maintainer.pl are copied from linux project, then I made some changes for fstests specially.)

PATCH 3~5 are still under reviewing, hasn't been decided...

About [3/5], if someone mailing list doesn't want to be in cc list of related fstests patch, please clarify, I'll remove.

About [4/5], if someone people doesn't want to be CCed, tell me, I'll remove.

About [5/5], need more reviewing from btrfs list.

If others fs which *always send patches to fstests@* and *hope to have a specific co-maintainer* who can help more on your patches (to fststs) before merging, refer to [5/5].

Thanks,
Zorro