bootm refactoring
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest1 of 11 patches 0 repliesNew
1 of 11 patches is in this archive. The cover letter announces 11.
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9/11 | bootm: refactor image detection and os load steps | +0 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [U-Boot] [WIP][PATCH 00/11] bootm refactoring
Quoted 10 lines · Kumar Gala
Quoted 7 lines · Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message <B10531D5-A045-4A60-
Quoted 1 line · A368-9ADA9590B5C3 at kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
I'm adding a "boots" command that implements sub commands. Once I
I saw it. Actually I don't like it. Why didn't you stick with the original plan to implement subcommands as part of bootm ?
Quoted 7 lines
Can you be more precise about what you dont like. Just the new command, how its implemented, or something else? Also, what plan did we agree on?
I choose a new command because of my concern about how to distinguish the sub-command from a FIT identifier. But it looks like that might not be an issue.
Hi Kumar,
The command "boots" is already taken.
$ grep loads common/*.c
[snip]
common/cmd_load.c: "loads - load S-Record file over serial line\n",Best regards,
gvb