ocfs2: Support for discontiguous block group.
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first · linked by author and title
- v2 Latest posting 4/40 of 17 patches 0 repliesNew
- v2 posting 3/40 of 17 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
- v2 posting 2/40 of 17 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
Earlier versions · 2
| Version | Posted | Patches | Replies | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v2 posting 1/4 | 17 patches | 0 replies | Superseded | |
| v1 | 15 patches | 0 replies | Superseded |
Patches in v2 posting 4/4 No applies recorded yet
None of the 17 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v2 yet.
Cover letter [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 00/17 V2] ocfs2: Support for discontiguous block group.
Quoted 21 lines · Joel Becker
Quoted 19 lines · Joel Becker
Quoted 8 lines · Tao Ma
Quoted 4 lines
Let me know if/when your discontig-bg branch has the code you
want to go upstream. It may already; I'm just confirming before I pull.It is ok there. please pull
git://oss.oracle.com/git/tma/linux-2.6.gitdiscontig-bgTao,
This branch has the bogusorig_value_sizefix. The good one is
in the fixes branch, and they conflict. Also, you have three patches in this branch without descriptions:patch speedup.fix
patch unwritten.fix
patch DLM.fix
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Please fix this.
Actually, your discontig-bg branch doesn't look much like this
patch series at all.
yes, there are 2 changes in this branch against the patch I sent to the mailist(you can check the commit time for it).
1. for the patch "ocfs2_claim_*() don't need an ocfs2_super argument", I rebased it since it has conflict with your new merge-window.
2. for the patch "Add ocfs2_gd_is_discontig", we need le16_to_cpu(bg->bg_size).
Regards,
Tao