Small change needed in nfs_xdr.h
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest2 patches 1 replyIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/2 | nfs_xdr: Move nfs4_string definition out of #ifdef CONFIG_NFS_V4include/ | +5 | 1 reply | |
| 2/2 | exofs: pnfs-tree: Remove pnfs-osd private definitionsfs/ fs/ | +1 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
1 of 2 patches has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.
| Patch | Trond Myklebust |
|---|---|
| 1/2 | A-b |
| 2/2 |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [PATCHSET 0/2] Small change needed in nfs_xdr.h
Hi trond
I need this simple patch:
[PATCH 1/2] nfs_xdr: Move nfs4_string definition out of #ifdef CONFIG_NFS_V4
exofs file system wants to use pnfs_osd_xdr.h file instead of redefining pnfs-objects types in it's private "pnfs.h" header.
Before we do the switch we must make sure pnfs_osd_xdr.h is compilable also under NFS versions smaller than 4.1. Since now it is needed regardless of version, by the exofs code.
Only miss-out is nfs4_string move it to global scope.
So I can submit this patch to the exofs tree:
[PATCH 1/2] exofs: pnfs-tree: Remove pnfs-osd private definitions
Now that pnfs-osd has hit mainline we can remove exofs's private header. (And the FIXME comment)
The small problem is that if we both keep a copy of the patch in linux-next, it will be fine until there are possibly more changes to nfs_xdr.h. git merge will not like that.
If you have another batch for this -rc you could include the patch and I'll rebase my linux-next on that -rc. Or we can risk having the same patch and if there are any more changes just ping me and I'll see what I do with linux-next. Or you can send me your ack-by: and I can submit it through exofs tree.
Thanks
Boaz