RFC Consolidation: move SMP local timers to driver/clocksource
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 RFC Latest0 of 16 patches 0 repliesNew
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
None of the 16 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [RFC PATCH 00/16] Consolidation: move SMP local timers to driver/clocksource
Quoted 17 lines · Rob Herring
Arnd,
Quoted 4 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 3 lines · Marc Zyngier
Patches against next-20110615 + my earlier GIC-PPI series. Tested on VExpress, PB11MP, Pandaboard, Tegra Harmony and Exynos4 SMDK-v310.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Thomas and Arnd cc-ed on the whole series, as this could be consolidation material.
Very nice stuff. Should we take this all in one branch in the arm-soc tree, pending Acks from the subarch maintainers?
We could also push it through the individual subarch branches, but my feeling is that would be more work.
Quoted 5 lines
If this is the direction to go, then there are a lot of other timers that can be moved besides just local timers. But Russell didn't really like the shmobile patches for early platform devices which this relies on. So we should get agreement on the small bit of infrastructure needed first, then start moving individual timers.
I'm open to suggestions. Should the early platform infrastructure be flagged as unsuitable, I'd be happy to switch to something else, as long as it is minimal, and does not create another ARM-specific API (been there, done that...).
Quoted 2 lines
Also, device tree support for early platform devices would be useful for this.
Indeed.
M.
Signature · 1 line
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...