RFC Prototype for generic SPL framework
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 RFC Latest4 of 9 patches 0 repliesNew
4 of 9 patches are in this archive. The cover letter announces 9.
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3/9 | Extend build-system for SPL framework | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 3/9 | Extend build-system for SPL framework | +0 | 0 replies | |
| 6/9 | scaled down version of generic libraries for SPL | +0 | 2 replies | |
| 6/9 | scaled down version of generic libraries for SPL | +0 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] Prototype for generic SPL framework
Quoted 8 lines · Wolfgang Denk
Dear Daniel Schwierzeck,
Quoted 4 lines · In message<1310569869-31810-1-git-send-email-daniel.schwierzeck@googlemail.com>…
This patch series is the final proposal from Aneesh and myself for a generic SPL framework. The implementation already works and have been tested with in-tree and out-of-tree builds. The latest feedback from ML is already included.
Quoted 4 lines
I read your patches, and except to the documentation commetns I already made I have but only one question (I did not spend enough time to figure this out myself, sorry): Do you think the split of the patches is OK, i. e. do we maintain bisectability ?
I tried building after applying each patch one by one. There are no errors or warnings.
best regards,
Aneesh