ARM: EXYNOS4: Support generic Power domain framework for EXYNOS4210
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest0 of 4 patches 0 repliesNew
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
None of the 4 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/4] ARM: EXYNOS4: Support generic Power domain framework for EXYNOS4210
Quoted 33 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 25 lines · Chanwoo Choi
The following patch set use the generic Power domain Framework instead of power domain code depend of Samsung SoC.
Chanwoo Choi (4):
ARM: EXYNOS4: Support for generic I/O power domains on EXYNOS4210
ARM: EXYNOS4: Support for generic Clock manipulation PM callbacks
ARM: EXYNOS4: Delete the power-domain code depend on Samsung SoC
ARM: EXYNOS4: Add power domain to use generic Power domain Frameworkarch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig | 10 +- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile | 4 +- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/dev-pd.c | 139 -------------- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/pm-exynos4210.h | 52 ++++++ arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/regs-clock.h | 8 + arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-nuri.c | 21 ++- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkc210.c | 26 ++- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkv310.c | 23 ++- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-universal_c210.c | 21 ++- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/pm-exynos4210.c | 189 ++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/mach-exynos4/pm-runtime.c | 56 ++++++ arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig | 8 - arch/arm/plat-samsung/Makefile | 4 - arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/pd.h | 30 --- arch/arm/plat-samsung/pd.c | 95 ---------- 15 files changed, 377 insertions(+), 309 deletions(-)Quoted 6 lines
delete mode 100644
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/dev-pd.c
create mode 100644arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/pm-exynos4210.hcreate mode 100644arch/arm/mach-exynos4/pm-exynos4210.ccreate mode 100644arch/arm/mach-exynos4/pm-runtime.cdelete mode 100644arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/pd.hdelete mode 100644arch/arm/plat-samsung/pd.c
Quoted 4 lines
The patchset looks good to me, but please note that some code it is based on will most likely change in 3.2 due to this patchset:
Are we going to have this patch set in 3.2 ? Does it need more work or is it already merged in someone's -next repository ?
--
Thanks,
Sylwester