mx5: USB host support for mx51evk and mx53loco
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest0 of 5 patches 0 repliesNew
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
None of the 5 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5] mx5: USB host support for mx51evk and mx53loco
Quoted 41 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 41 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 33 lines
Quoted 24 lines
This patches series provides USB host support for the mx51evk and mx53loco. The generic ehci-mx5 interface is derived from ehci-mxc and uses the header files of the ehci-fsl interface. The callback
board_ehci_hcd_init()allows to do board-specific setup when USB is started.Wolfgang.
Wolfgang Grandegger (5):
mx5: add helper functions to enable USB clocks
mx5: add helper function to retrieve the GPIO number
mx5: add generic USB EHCI support for mx51 and mx53
mx53loco: add end enable USB host support on port 1
mx51evk: add end enable USB host support on port 1arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/clock.c | 72 ++++++++++++ arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/clock.h | 5 + arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/crm_regs.h | 3 + arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/mx5x_pins.h | 4 + board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c | 92 +++++++++++++++ board/freescale/mx53loco/mx53loco.c | 10 ++ drivers/usb/host/Makefile | 1 + drivers/usb/host/ehci-mx5.c | 174Quoted 8 lines
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/configs/mx51evk.h|13 ++
include/configs/mx53loco.h | 13 ++ include/usb/ehci-fsl.h | 10 ++ 11 files changed, 397 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/usb/host/ehci-mx5.cQuoted 4 lines
Hi,
isn't Jana already doing this kind of USB support for mx5 based on my old patches? You didn't notice?
Well, I already responded on Jana's patches and presented my ideas here:
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
http://marc.info/?l=u-boot&m=132067806107887&w=2
Unfortunately, only the mails with subject "[PATCH] ..." get enough attention ;-).
Well aparently she isn't even signed to the ML ... so you need to CC her ... doh :-/
What do you mean? I replied to *all*!
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
The big difference to Jana's patch is that he uses a board-specific implementation (
ehci_hcd_init()is in board specific code). I think we should share some code.Please do.
See my patches ;-). Well, maybe it's more straight forward if we try to get my patches for the MX51/53 boards accepted first and then Jana could then use the negotiated interface. But also vise versa is fine for me.
Wolfgang.