Device tree support for TWL regulators
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first · linked by author and title
- v3 Latest posting 2/20 of 2 patches 0 repliesNew
- v3 posting 1/20 of 2 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
Patches in v3 posting 2/2 No applies recorded yet
None of the 2 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v3 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators
Quoted 16 lines · Grant Likely
Quoted 15 lines · Benoit
Hi Mark,
Quoted 9 lines · Mark Brown
Quoted 2 lines · Rajendra Nayak
Depending on what order Mark happens to pull them in, I am fine re-sending adding support for the 2 twl6030 fixed regulators.
Please can you guys come up with a single unified series for this stuff
- I'll hold off on applying anything to allow you to do this.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
The issue is that the initial TWL regulator series from Rajendra will depend on the twl core DT support I have that depends on the
irq_domainseries from Grant...If it depends on the irqdomain tree, then just merge that tree into yours. That tree is stable now for exactly that reason. You can rely on it.
I've just posted a pull request [1] to Tony that will merge your series into an OMAP DT branch to be a base for further OMAP DT series.
Regards,
Benoit