OMAP: mailbox initial device tree support
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest1 of 2 patches 0 repliesNew
1 of 2 patches is in this archive. The cover letter announces 2.
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2/2 | arm/dts: OMAP2+: Add mailbox nodes | +0 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
The patch has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.
| Patch | Benoit Cousson |
|---|---|
| 2/2 | A-b |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/2] OMAP: mailbox initial device tree support
Quoted 7 lines · Vaibhav
Hi Omar,
Quoted 3 lines · Omar Ramirez Luna
To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree.
Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested.
Quoted 7 lines
I think the mailbox code needs a cleanup similar to what you had proposed earlier [1] before the device tree support is added.
We probably need to decide whether the number of mailbox sub-modules should be part of hwmod attribute or come from device tree. IMO the static allocation of the mailboxes is better suited in the device-tree data.
Ideally yes, but that assumes we are supporting only DT boot method, which is still not the case today.
That being said, the driver might still be able to leverage DT if available already.
This can be done later as well.
Omar,
That's up to you.
Regards,
Benoit