Skip to content

IIO: AT91: add lowres, sleep and sample&hold time missing support

Jonathan Cameron linux-arm-kernel linux-iio 1 version New

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

  1. v1 Latest1 of 3 patches 0 repliesNew

1 of 3 patches is in this archive. The cover letter announces 3.

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

#Subject and filesSizeRepliesApplied
2/3ARM: AT91: IIO: add sleep mode support+0 -00 replies

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [PATCH 0/3] IIO: AT91: add lowres, sleep and sample&hold time missing support
Quoted 24 lines · Nicolas Ferre

On 12/19/2012 07:32 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :

Quoted 14 lines

Hi,

The current adc driver is missing some key feature support
- select high/low resolution support
- sleep mode
- Sample and Hold Time

This patch seris fix it
Without it the current driver is not usable in most of the case

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (2):
ARM: AT91: IIO: add sleep mode support
ARM: AT91: IIO: fix missing Sample and Hold time

Quoted 8 lines

Ludovic Desroches (1):
ARM: AT91: IIO: add low and high res support for adc

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-adc.txt |   13 ++++++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9260.dtsi                  |    3 +++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g45.dtsi                  |    3 +++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi                   |    3 +++
 drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c                          |   90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
Quoted 4 lines

As this series is touching both a driver and the DT files, we will have to pay attention to the path that we will take for upstream.

Arm-soc is my preferred location...

I don't particularly care as I don't know of anything else that is planned for this cycle that will touch this driver but generally I'd consider this series driver changes with additions to the device tree to support new functionality.

The only reason to merge through the arm-soc tree I can see is that there is likely to be more churn in the device tree files.

There is also the question of whether that missing sample and hold time is a fix we want to push out this cycle, or whether it can wait for the next merge window. I'm not clear from the description.

Jonathan

Quoted 11 lines

Bye,

Quoted 5 lines
 5 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Best Regards,
J.