Unify arm_generic and arch_timer drivers
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v5 Latest0 of 16 patches 0 repliesNew
Patches in v5 No applies recorded yet
None of the 16 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v5 yet.
Cover letter [PATCHv5 00/16] Unify arm_generic and arch_timer drivers
Quoted 6 lines · Mark Rutland
This is an updated version of v4 of the series I posted 2 weeks ago [1].
The only change is the last two patches, moving over to always using the virtual counters. I've left these as separate patches rather than folding them in to allow them to be reviewed more easily.
Quoted 8 lines
I've tested the series on a TC2 and an AArch64 model, and I'm happy that it all works.
Stephen, Thomas:
I've not folded the
CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLAREpatch as it's unclear what path everything is going to take, and I don't a have a tree with Stephen's patch that I can base on.
I'm pretty sure it'll go through arm-soc's timer/cleanup branch. At the very least, it'd have to go through some tree based on that...
Quoted 4 lines
There's already a dependency on the timer broadcast rework, and adding more branches to the mix is going to get messy. I can take the version with ifdefs under the assumption we remove them in a later patch once Stephen's patch is in. Does that sound ok?
Just one more simple merge:-)
But yet, it's a simple cleanup to do later, so I have no problem with that.