Skip to content

RFC ARM: MPIDR linearization

Stephen Warren linux-arm-kernel 3 versions – New

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first · linked by author and title

  1. v2 RFC Latest posting 3/30 of 2 patches 0 repliesNew
  2. v2 RFC posting 2/30 of 2 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
  3. v2 RFC posting 1/30 of 2 patches 0 repliesSuperseded

Patches in v2 posting 3/3 No applies recorded yet

None of the 2 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v2 yet.

Read the v2 thread

Cover letter [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: MPIDR linearization
Quoted 21 lines · Lorenzo Pieralisi
Quoted 20 lines · Stephen Warren
Quoted 18 lines · Lorenzo Pieralisi

Hi Stephen,

Quoted 11 lines · Stephen Warren
Quoted 6 lines · Lorenzo Pieralisi

Hi Russell, all,

even though I think this set is ready to get merged, it would be great if we can test it on as many platforms as possible since it touches core suspend/resume operations on ARM platforms relying on CONFIG_ARM_CPU_SUSPEND, and there are many.

FWIW, I booted a Tegra system with these patches applied and didn't see any issue in very brief testing. I'm not sure what targeted testing would be useful?

That's great thanks. CPUidle deep C-states (when CPUs resume from reset through cpu_resume) are the main triggers of this code, so you should be running with them enabled to test it.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

OK, in that case I believe I tested that; I had our "LP2" CPU power-management mode enabled as always, and that powers off the CPUs and resumes them, and didn't see any issue.

Great, thanks, I guess this also means you did not notice any suspicious warnings at boot (ie "Large number of MPIDR hash buckets detected").

I didn't, although I didn't look that hard for them!

Quoted 1 line

Can I add your tested-by please ?

Sure.