MSI support for Marvell EBU PCIe driver
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first · linked by author and title
- v9 Latest posting 2/20 of 10 patches 0 repliesNew
- v9 posting 1/20 of 10 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
- v6 posting 2/20 of 13 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
Earlier versions · 2
| Version | Posted | Patches | Replies | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v6 posting 1/2 | 0 of 13 patches | 0 replies | Superseded | |
| v5 | 0 of 11 patches | 0 replies | Superseded |
Patches in v9 posting 2/2 No applies recorded yet
None of the 10 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v9 yet.
Cover letter [PATCHv9 00/10] MSI support for Marvell EBU PCIe driver
Quoted 17 lines · Jason Cooper
Quoted 16 lines · Stephen Warren
Quoted 14 lines · Jason Cooper
Thomas,
Whole series applied as follows:
+---+ mvebu/msi_pci (1-4,7) | +---+---+ mvebu/msi_irq (5,6) | +---+---+ mvebu/msi_mvebu (8-10)mvebu/msi_pci built successfully with Randy's config for
x86_64.Thierry, I've tagged mvebu/msi_pci. Unless it all falls apart in -next, those commit-id's won't change from what will be in arm-soc.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
So, the branch still isn't stable, hence I shouldn't use it as a baseline to apply Thierry's PCIe patches?
It's as stable as I can make it. I've tested it for all known build regressions (discovered in -next), and I see no reason to change it. Anything needing fixed after today, I'll append the fix to it's HEAD if appropriate.
OK, if you will only append fixes rather than rebase the branch, then it's fine; what you said above implied that the commit IDs still might change.
So, I'll try pulling this in with Thierry's patches today.
Thanks.