RFC Early patches to get rid of meminfo
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 RFC Latest0 of 2 patches 0 repliesNew
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
None of the 2 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [RFC 0/2] Early patches to get rid of meminfo
Quoted 31 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
Quoted 24 lines · Laura Abbott
Quoted 15 lines · Leif Lindholm
Hi Laura,
Quoted 9 lines · Laura Abbott
With the move away from bootmem and the convergence on memblock, it seems like meminfo should be deprecated as well to avoid duplication. This is a first pass attempt to just use memblock and not have meminfo integrated.
There is still a major issue in terms of actually specifying mem at location on the command line but I wanted to send this out for some early feedback before putting any more effort into this. I've done basic boot testing on a simple DT target.Quoted 5 lines
I can't see 1/2 and 2/2 - either in my inbox or in the archive. Could you resend?
/
LeifQuoted 5 lines
The patches are being held for moderation because apparently they have "a suspicious header". Not sure how the cover letter made it through but the patches didn't. If they don't get approved by end of the day I'll try re-sending.
Quoted 6 lines
Hi Laura,
This is a known issue that is triggered by the fact that the word PATCH is missing from your subject line.
Could you resend but replace 'RFC' with 'RFC PATCH' ?
Thanks for catching that, I will resend.
Laura
Signature · 2 lines
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation