ath9k|ath9k_htc: move dups to common-beacon
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest0 of 23 patches 0 repliesNew
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
None of the 23 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 00/23] ath9k|ath9k_htc: move dups to common-beacon
Am 14.03.2014 20:22, schrieb John W. Linville:
Quoted 48 lines · Oleksij Rempel
Quoted 11 lines
Am 07.03.2014 11:18, schrieb Sujith Manoharan:
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines · Oleksij Rempel
Last response was about initvals, my patch set affect only beacon code. Since i don't plan to rewrite
ath9k_htcfrom scratch, i would assume it will be better to continue this periodic clean work.I didn't review the patches, but someone else needs to make sure that nothing is broken in ath9k.
I use this code one week ind STA mode. But if you need more directed alternate testing, who is good candidate for this work?
I applied the series and attempted a build. But...
CC
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/tx99.o
In file included frominclude/linux/bitops.h:33:0,from include/linux/kernel.h:10, from include/linux/skbuff.h:17, from include/linux/if_ether.h:23, from include/linux/etherdevice.h:25, from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h:20, from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/tx99.c:17: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/tx99.c: In function ?ath9k_tx99_init?: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/tx99.c:111:15: error: ?SC_OP_INVALID? undeclared (first use in this function) if (test_bit(SC_OP_INVALID, &sc->sc_flags)) { ^ /home/linville/git/wireless-next/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:338:25: note: in definition of macro ?test_bit? (__builtin_constant_p((nr)) \ ^ drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/tx99.c:111:15: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in if (test_bit(SC_OP_INVALID, &sc->sc_flags)) { ^ /home/linville/git/wireless-next/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:338:25: note: in definition of macro ?test_bit? (__builtin_constant_p((nr)) \ ^ drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/tx99.c:111:33: error: ?struct ath_softc? has no member named ?sc_flags? if (test_bit(SC_OP_INVALID, &sc->sc_flags)) { ^ /home/linville/git/wireless-next/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:339:30: note: in definition of macro ?test_bit? ? constant_test_bit((nr), (addr)) \ ^ drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/tx99.c:111:33: error: ?struct ath_softc? has no member named ?sc_flags? if (test_bit(SC_OP_INVALID, &sc->sc_flags)) { ^ /home/linville/git/wireless-next/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:340:30: note: in definition of macro ?test_bit? : variable_test_bit((nr), (addr))) ^
Quoted 6 lines
make[3]: *** [
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/tx99.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k] Error 2 make[1]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/ath] Error 2
make: *** [drivers/net/wireless/] Error 2I'll be backing this out for now...
thank you. I missed CONFIG_EXPERT :/
in attachment is second version of affected patch.
Signature · 9 lines
Regards, Oleksij -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-ath9k-move-sc_flags-to-ath_common.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 20132 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20140315/18cd76cb/attachment-0001.bin