staging: gdm72xx: Code cleanup
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first · linked by author and title
- v5 Latest10 patches 0 repliesNew
- v410 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
Patches in v5 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/10 | staging: gdm72xx: Remove unnecessary extern declarations from header filesdrivers/ drivers/ drivers/ | +6 | 0 replies | |
| 2/10 | staging: gdm72xx: Replace comparisons on jiffies values with wrap-safe functionsdrivers/ drivers/ | +3 | 0 replies | |
| 3/10 | staging: gdm72xx: Modify a struct allocation to match coding standardsdrivers/ | +1 | 0 replies | |
| 4/10 | staging: gdm72xx: Move logical continuation to previous line to conform to coding styledrivers/ | +2 | 0 replies | |
| 5/10 | staging: gdm72xx: Fix some camel-case variablesdrivers/ | +15 | 0 replies | |
| 6/10 | staging: gdm72xx: Fix braces to conform with coding styledrivers/ drivers/ | +12 | 0 replies | |
| 7/10 | staging: gdm72xx: Removed commented-out codedrivers/ drivers/ drivers/ +1 more | +1 | 0 replies | |
| 8/10 | staging: gdm72xx: Whitespace fixes to conform to coding standardsdrivers/ drivers/ drivers/ +5 more | +101 | 0 replies | |
| 9/10 | staging: gdm72xx: Indentation and other whitespace fixesdrivers/ drivers/ drivers/ +7 more | +97 | 0 replies | |
| 10/10 | staging: gdm72xx: Remove task from TODO listdrivers/ | +0 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v5 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH v5 0/10] staging: gdm72xx: Code cleanup
Quoted 48 lines · Michalis Pappas
Ok, I generated a new patchset based on running checkpatch.pl with the --strict option, as well as any recommendations made earlier on this thread.
From the following patches, both 8/10 and 9/10 involve whitespace fixes:
the former fixes issues reported by checkpatch.pl while the latter is mostly indentation stuff found by inspecting the code, stray tabs etc. I am sending them as separate patches in case one wants to keep only one of them.After applying the patches, the following issues are still reported by checkpatch.pl. My comments follow:
ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis #34: FILE: usb_ids.h:34:
(quoted diff) +3
-0+#define USB_DEVICE_BOOTLOADER(vid, pid) \ + {USB_DEVICE((vid), ((pid)&BL_PID_MASK)|B_DOWNLOAD)}, \ + {USB_DEVICE((vid), ((pid)&BL_PID_MASK)|B_DOWNLOAD|B_DIFF_DL_DRV)}We agreed on that one already.
WARNING:LONG_LINE: line over 80 characters
This comes out in cases where I slightly bent the 80 chars rule to improve readability. Should anyone complain that it doesn't fit their terminal I promise I'll revert it back ;)
WARNING: unchecked sscanf return value
#295: FILE: gdm_wimax.c:295:(quoted diff) +1
-0+ sscanf(e->dev->name, "wm%d", &idx);From my understanding this should be ok. The value stored in e->dev>name is generated by
__dev_alloc_namewhich does all the necessary checks for user supplied input etc, so it should be considered as a trusted value.WARNING:SPACING: Missing a blank line after declarations
This is a false positive, as it refers to pointer-to-function declarations withing structures.
CHECK:BRACES: Blank lines aren't necessary after an open brace '{'
I found it to be more readable the way it was, so I didn't touch it.
CHECK:UNCOMMENTED_DEFINITION:
spinlock_tdefinition without commentI am not sure what the locks are used for so I am unable to write a comment on these.
Quoted 8 lines
Regards,
-Michalis
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Updates from v4:
* Fixed message subjects
* Improved commit messages
* Added forgotten signed-of-by's
Thanks,
-Michalis