sunxi: clk: Various cleanup and rework
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest5 of 6 patches 0 repliesNew
5 of 6 patches are in this archive. The cover letter announces 6.
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2/6 | clk: sunxi: Move the 24M oscillator to a file of its own | +0 | 0 replies | |
| 2/6 | clk: sunxi: Move the 24M oscillator to a file of its own | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 2/6 | clk: sunxi: Move the 24M oscillator to a file of its own | +0 | 0 replies | |
| 3/6 | clk: sunxi: Move the GMAC clock to a file of its own | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 3/6 | clk: sunxi: Move the GMAC clock to a file of its own | +0 | 1 reply |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 0/6] sunxi: clk: Various cleanup and rework
Hi Maxime,
El 10/05/14 00:33, Maxime Ripard escribi?:
Quoted 12 lines
Hi everyone,
This patchset fixes a few things that have been pending for quite a while in the clock driver.
First, it removes the
clk_putcalls in the clock protection part. Since it's not really something that should be done, I guess this patch is not very controversial.Then, it starts splitting the huge clock driver file into separate, smaller drivers when it makes sense.
Quoted 8 lines
Finally, it reworks the clock protection mechanism to handle differences between SoC in a better way. This has been pretty controversial because the first approach has been to move this to the machine code. This is another attempt that leaves all the modifications in the driver itself.
Thanks,
Maxime
Overall the series looks good to me, other than the comment about clkdev on patches 2 and 3.
@Mike, do you want me to take them in a pull as usual after you have a look? Please let me know as we still haven't clarified the situation with the two patches Hans sent.
Cheers, and thanks Maxime for working on cleaning this :)
Emilio