Skip to content

Missing interface declarations

Christopher J. PeBenito selinux-refpolicy 1 version New

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

  1. v1 Latest4 of 5 patches 0 repliesNew

4 of 5 patches are in this archive. The cover letter announces 5.

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

#Subject and filesSizeRepliesApplied
1/5Introduce interface allowing relabeling from/to non-security file types+0 -01 reply
1/5Introduce interface allowing relabeling from/to non-security file types+0 -00 replies
4/5Introduce the tmpfiles_t domain+0 -04 replies
4/5Introduce the tmpfiles_t domain+0 -00 replies

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [refpolicy] [PATCH 0/5] Missing interface declarations
Quoted 11 lines · Sven Vermeulen

It seems that a couple of interfaces in kernel/files.if are calling kernel_* interfaces that don't exist yet.

Let's play safe and introduce them.

Sven Vermeulen (5):
Introduce kernel_delete_unlabeled_symlinks
Introduce kernel_delete_unlabeled_pipes
Introduce kernel_delete_unlabeled_sockets
Introduce kernel_delete_unlabeled_blk_files
Introduce kernel_delete_unlabeled_chr_files

Quoted 2 lines
 policy/modules/kernel/kernel.if | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)

I do several combinations of builds, so its strange that I didn't hit these. The interfaces in the files module must not be used.

This set is merged.

Signature · 3 lines
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com

Read the cover letter in its thread