Skip to content

Migrate PXA27x platforms to clock framework

Daniel Mack linux-arm-kernel linux-devicetree 1 version New

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

  1. v3 Latest0 of 6 patches 0 repliesNew

Patches in v3 No applies recorded yet

None of the 6 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v3 yet.

Read the v3 thread

Cover letter [PATCH v3 0/6] Migrate PXA27x platforms to clock framework
Quoted 10 lines · Robert Jarzmik
Quoted 7 lines · Arnd Bergmann

For the specific case of PXA, I wonder if we should update the maintainer entry. As far as I can tell, Eric and Russell are no longer actively involved in the maintenance of PXA, and Haojian is doing only the bare minimum and is kept busy by other platforms these days (mach-hisi, mach-mmp). Should we perhaps add you and/or Daniel and remove some of the others if they are no longer as actively working on PXA?

Quoted 2 lines

Sure, I'll send a patch to add myself to the MAINTAINERS of pxa. Would be great if Daniel stepped in too, as my pxa3xx knowledge is poor.

Sure, why not. However, I only have one platform to test PXA3xx stuff on, and that's a custom-made one that is not very versatile. Hence, I always thought that a maintainer who's employed by the chip vendor is a very good thing to have, because I'd imagined the vendor usually has access to a wider range of different hardware.

Also, I'm no longer actively working with this platform for my day job, so my efforts will be limited to my spare time. But after all, PXA has been quite calm over the years now. The only bigger topics that will consume some time in the future seem to be DT and DMA.

Quoted 2 lines

As to removing Russell and Eric, we should get their opinion, it's as they want, I can send it in the maintainers patch if they agree.

Yes, I'd definitely like to hear their opinion, too.

Daniel