arch: arm64: Enable support for Samsung Exynos7 SoC
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v5 Latest0 of 8 patches 0 repliesNew
Patches in v5 No applies recorded yet
None of the 8 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v5 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH v5 0/8] arch: arm64: Enable support for Samsung Exynos7 SoC
Hi Abhilash,
Quoted 24 lines · Abhilash Kesavan
Quoted 22 lines · Abhilash Kesavan
Quoted 20 lines · Kukjin Kim
Quoted 9 lines · Tomasz Figa
Quoted 8 lines · Abhilash Kesavan
Quoted 6 lines · Tomasz Figa
The clock patches look good to me, but since they are doing quite a lot of code moving I'd prefer to take them through clk tree. Based on the fact that there are no code dependencies between clock patches and remaining ones and Exynos7 is a new material for 3.18, I'm inclined to apply them to my tree if nobody minds.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
Will you be picking up the clock changes soon ?
I'd like to do so. Kukjin, since clock changes are a part of this series, might I have your Ack for them to be applied separately?
Sure, I'm fine so please go ahead with my ack on the changes.
Acked-by Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>Thanks for your asking.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Can you please pick up the clock changes now that Kukjin has ack'ed it.
Sylwester, you mentioned in another thread that Tomasz might not be available for the next few days. Could you please consider applying the clock changes in this series to samsung clk-next if they look OK ?
Please take a look at clock changes at
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg370673.html too.
I've picked up patches from the $subject series. But please see my comment the the second series you've pointed out with the link above. If you decide to rearrange changes to exynos7-clk.h header file among those two series I will drop that 4 patches. Perhaps you could gather all pending exynos7 clk patches, fix any issues and send to me in one series ?
I'd like to avoid modifying indices assigned to specific clocks in subsequent patches, DT binding should be defined in advance and ideally be specifying exact indices for each possible clock.
--
Thanks,
Sylwester