Skip to content

cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms

Sylwester Nawrocki linux-arm-kernel linux-pm linux-samsung-soc 1 version New

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

  1. v12 Latest0 of 6 patches 0 repliesNew

Patches in v12 No applies recorded yet

None of the 6 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.

Reviews trailers per patch

PatchSylwester Nawrocki
SeriesA-b

Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.

Read the v12 thread

Cover letter [PATCH v12 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms

Hi All,

Quoted 11 lines · Thomas Abraham

Changes since v11:
- Rebased on top of git://linuxtv.org/snawrocki/samsung.git for-v3.19-exynos-clk

This patch series removes the use of Exynos4210 and Exynos5250 specific cpufreq drivers and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver for these platforms. This series also enables cpufreq support for Exynos5420 using arm_big_little cpufreq driver.

This series is based on the following branch.
git://linuxtv.org/snawrocki/samsung.git for-v3.19-exynos-clk

Quoted 8 lines

This series depends on the following patch which can be picked from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git samsung/dt e540920cf21c (ARM: dts: add CPU nodes for Exynos4 SoCs).

This patch series has been tested on Exynos4210/5250/5420 based boards. Tomasz Figa had plans to take this in the Samsung clock tree for v3.19
(http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg37933.html).
Sylwester, could you consider to merge this in your tree?

This patch series has already conflicts in arch/arm/boot/dts/ with the arm-soc tree. It touches quite many files at arch/arm. Perhaps we could still have it merged through Kukjin's and arm-soc tree ?

Feel free to add for the whole series:

Signature · 2 lines
Thanks,
Sylwester