Skip to content

ARM: mvebu: armada-*: Relicense the device tree under GPLv2+/X11

Gregory CLEMENT linux-arm-kernel lkml 1 version New

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

  1. v1 Latest0 of 27 patches 0 repliesNew

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

None of the 27 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [PATCH 00/27] ARM: mvebu: armada-*: Relicense the device tree under GPLv2+/X11
Quoted 26 lines · Jason Cooper
Quoted 18 lines · Gregory CLEMENT
Quoted 6 lines · Jason Cooper

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
...

Quoted 3 lines

Jason at the end it seems you didn't ack or nack the patches were you were CC. You expressed some concerns about the GPLv2+ move but I don't know if it is something that prevents you to give your acked-by.

Quoted 7 lines

Oops. :) I figured my S-o-B when applying would be sufficient. That decision was before we decided on Andrew applying patches this time around...

For all my dts{i} contributions:

Thanks :)

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Due to all the merge commits over time and whatnot, it's probably best to put my Ack on all the patches in this series...

OK no problem. By the way, I take care of collecting all the acked-by and once it will be done I will either sent the updated patch set with all the acked-by or maybe just I will create a branch to pull if it is easier to handle.

Quoted 6 lines

Ok, that'll be up to Andrew.

Once we have the last few stragglers, and assuming there are no more NAKs, here's what I'd like to do:

Regrettably, we'll have to revert Simon's dts contributions. I say

You missed the email he sent yesterday, finally Simon changed his mind and gave his acked-by.

Quoted 16 lines

'regret' in that I regret having to potentially discourage a valuable contributor. I *don't* regret him sticking to his guns. :)

As for what to do after that, I think we (the core mvebu folks) should *not* rewrite the Lacie dts files. That just seems hinky to me.

If there's community interest, someone will crop up who copies one of the dual licensed dts files and modifies it to boot his/her Lacie board. When they submit a patch, we'll DCO/SoB double check them and apply the patch(es).

thx,

Jason.

Signature · 4 lines
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com