Tegra210/P2571 initial support
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first · linked by author and title
- v3 Latest5 of 6 patches 0 repliesNew
- v2 posting 2/22 of 6 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
- v2 posting 1/26 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
Earlier versions · 1
| Version | Posted | Patches | Replies | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v1 | 4 patches | 0 replies | Superseded |
5 of 6 patches are in this archive. The cover letter announces 6.
Patches in v3 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3/6 | ARM: Tegra210: Add SoC code/include files for T210 | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 4/6 | ARM: Tegra210: Add support to common Tegra source/config files | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 6/6 | T210: Add support for 64-bit T210-based P2571 board | +0 | 0 replies | |
| 6/6 | T210: Add support for 64-bit T210-based P2571 board | +0 | 3 replies | |
| 6/6 | T210: Add support for 64-bit T210-based P2571 board | +0 | 1 reply |
Reviews trailers per patch
None of the 5 patches has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by of their own; the series has one for all of them.
| Patch | Stephen Warren |
|---|---|
| Series | A-b |
| 3/6 | |
| 4/6 | |
| 6/6 | |
| 6/6 | |
| 6/6 |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 0/6] Tegra210/P2571 initial support
Quoted 8 lines · Tom Warren
This patch series adds support for the Tegra210 SoC and the P2571 board. Most of the T210 info is identical to T124 at this point, so I just cloned Venice2/Jetson-TK1 board files and T124 header/SoC code. Pinmux is the major area of difference at this time, but other changes will be made as more features of the board are brought up.
The series,
I've also validated that:
a) I can compile it when applied to upstream u-boot/master (a couple days old).
b) I applied it to our internal L4T U-Boot branch, ported it to another T210 board, flashed it, and booted an L4T kernel (with a few other L4T-specific patches on top).
I don't think that's quite enough for a Tested-by tag upstream since I haven't actually booted the upstream code, but it's good enough for me to consider the series tested:-)