Tegra210/P2571 initial support
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v3 Latest0 of 6 patches 0 repliesNew
Patches in v3 No applies recorded yet
None of the 6 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v3 yet.
Cover letter [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 0/6] Tegra210/P2571 initial support
Quoted 5 lines · Tom Warren
Thanks, Tom.
Simon Glass reviewed the earlier 64-bit patches, so I'll take that as the stamp of approval for them.
Stephen/Thierry - what about the most recent 3 'ARM: tegra' 64-bit patches? Do I need to wait until someone else has Ack'd / reviewed them, or do you feel they're good to go? I guess I can say that I've 'tested' them, but I'd really like someone besides myself to approve them.
I think as the Tegra maintainer, it's your privilege to take those patches whenever you wish, at least provided there's been reasonable opportunity for others to review them if they wish (probably ranging from little time at all for trivial/obvious fixes to a good few days for more complex or potentially disagreeable changes).
Quoted 81 lines
Tom
--
nvpublicQuoted 63 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Rini [mailto:trini at konsulko.com]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 3:08 PM
To: Tom Warren
Cc: Albert Aribaud; u-boot at lists.denx.de; Thierry Reding; Stephen Warren; tomcwarren3959 at gmail.com
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 0/6] Tegra210/P2571 initial support* PGP Signed by an unknown key
Quoted 14 lines · Tom Warren
TomR/Albert,
Quoted 12 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Warren [mailto:swarren at wwwdotorg.org]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 11:01 AM
To: Tom Warren
Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Thierry Reding; Stephen Warren; tomcwarren3959 at gmail.com
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 0/6] Tegra210/P2571 initial supportQuoted 3 lines · Tom Warren
This patch series adds support for the Tegra210 SoC and the P2571 board. Most of the T210 info is identical to T124 at this point, so I just cloned Venice2/Jetson-TK1 board files and T124 header/SoC
code.
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Pinmux is the major area of difference at this time, but other changes will be made as more features of the board are brought up.
The series,
Acked-by Stephen Warren <[email protected]>I've also validated that:
a) I can compile it when applied to upstream u-boot/master (a couple days old).
b) I applied it to our internal L4T U-Boot branch, ported it to another
T210 board, flashed it, and booted an L4T kernel (with a few other L4T-specific patches on top).Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I don't think that's quite enough for a Tested-by tag upstream since I haven't actually booted the upstream code, but it's good enough for me to consider the series tested:-)
I've applied my T210 work on top of Stephen's recent 10-patch 'arm' 64-bit
cleanup series and his 3-patch 'tegra' 64-bit fixes, onto my current u-boot- tegra/master after rebasing it against TOT u-boot/master. Everything builds OK (all Tegra 32-bit, and all ARM 64-bit), and my T210 boots OK to cmd prompt, with all periphs working (USB, I2C, SPI, GPIO, MMC).
Quoted 2 lines
So my question is, how should I go about issuing a PR for the T210 work? It
should apply OK w/o Stephen's 64-bit fixes, but it won't build w/o them. But only a few are actually Tegra-specific (the 3 from today).
Quoted 2 lines
Is it OK if I send one PR with _all_ these patches in u-boot-tegra/master,
including the 'arm' 64-bit, the 'tegra' 64-bit, and finally my T210 series on top? Or do you want them split up and the 'arm' 64-bit fixes taken in to either u- boot-arm/master or u-boot/master first (just pulled from the list, I guess), then a PR from me for the 3 Tegra 64-bit fixes plus my T210 series?
Quoted 7 lines
One PR with everything sounds OK to me.
--
Tom* Unknown Key
*0x56D6FECD_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot at lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot