ARM: orion5x/dove/mv78xx0 multiplatform
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest0 of 5 patches 8 repliesIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
None of the 5 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/5] ARM: orion5x/dove/mv78xx0 multiplatform
Quoted 25 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 10 lines · On Thursday 10 December 2015 22:14:25 Detlef Vollmann wrote:
Quoted 9 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 8 lines · On Thursday 10 December 2015 20:03:18 Detlef Vollmann wrote:
Quoted 7 lines · Arnd Bergmann
text data bss dec hex filename
942144 64112 17648 1023904 f9fa0 build/tmp/vmlinux-orion-allno 1027516 54052 20824 1102392 10d238 build/tmp/vmlinux-multi-plus-orion 1025320 66020 18744 1110084 10f044 build/tmp/vmlinux-orion-plus-ofThe diff below shows all the differences between orion-allno and multi-plus-orion.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
How did you get the orion-allno config and how did you get it compiled? I tried to apply your changes to my config and compile it, but it started silentoldconfig which introduced back '
ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM'The first and third row are without my patches, once they are applied,
ARCH_ORIONbecomes a sub-option ofARCH_MULTIPLATFORM.So with your patches it's no longer possible to build a small kernel, correct?
Correct. I was a bit surprised at how much object code enabling
CONFIG_OFadds these days, it used to be a lot less, but you are right that disablingCONFIG_OFis not possible with the way thatARCH_MULTIPLATFORMis structured.
Quoted 4 lines
It was always the plan to move all orion5x machines over to use
CONFIG_OFeventually, so you get that overhead one way or another, and at least it looks like doing multiplatform on top of OF doesn't add any noticeable extra overhead (the total numbers are actually smaller).
So the message is that Linux just get's bigger...
Fortunately this patch is planned for 4.5, and 4.4 is going to be an LTS kernel.
Quoted 1 line
It may also be worth investigating what has made
CONFIG_OFso costly,
Probably because too much is done at runtime and too few things can be fixed at build time.
Quoted 1 line
maybe we can reduce this a bit again.
Probably not without turning the wheel backward :-(
So for the test: yes it works, but I'm unhappy with it.
Detlef