Align library locations in target and staging

Arnout Vandecappelle buildroot 1 version Mar 27, 2016 New

Get series with b4

b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

v1 Latest Mar 27, 20161 of 5 patches 0 repliesNew

1 of 5 patches is in this archive. The cover letter announces 5.

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

#	Subject and files	Size	Replies	Applied
2/5	toolchain-external: remove unused calculation of ARCH_SUBDIR	+0 -0	0 replies

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/5] Align library locations in target and staging

Quoted 29 lines · Romain Naour

Hello Arnout, ThomasDS, All,
Le 27/03/2016 22:39, Arnout Vandecappelle a ?crit :
Quoted 26 lines · Thomas De Schampheleire
Quoted 24 lines
From: Thomas De Schampheleire <[email protected]>
As discussed on the Buildroot developer days, Buildroot installs some libraries in a different location in target than in staging. This is specifically seen for libstdc++ and libatomic.
This patch series tackles that problem and performs related cleanup.
Thomas De Schampheleire (5):
toolchain-external: blackfin: install FDPIC libraries also to staging
toolchain-external: remove unused calculation of ARCH_SUBDIR
toolchain-external: extract installation of gdbserver to separate
define
toolchain-external: align library locations in target and staging dir
toolchain-external: unify LIB_EXTERNAL_LIBS and USR_LIB_EXTERNAL_LIBS
   package/glibc/glibc.mk                             |  2 +-
   toolchain/helpers.mk                               | 57 ++---------------
   toolchain/toolchain-external/Config.in             |  3 +-
   toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external.mk | 71 ++++++++++------------
   4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)

Quoted 7 lines

Quoted 4 lines
I've also done a review and a test of the entire series. There is a bit of
reworking suggested by Romain in patch 3/5, the removal of -follow that I suggest in patch 4/5, and I would like to re-instate the --sysroot check in patch 2/5, but that's it.
What do you think about moving the sysroot check to a helper function like I propose in this series ? (Which needs to be rebased after ThomasDS's series as well)

That's a good solution, indeed. Actually, I had already applied those patches
and missed that the check was now still done in the configure step but just as part of check_unusable_toolchain.

Regards,
Arnout

Quoted 17 lines

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/576578/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/576580/
Thoughts ?
Best regards,
Romain
Quoted 6 lines
ThomasDS, will you respin or do we apply and make changes afterwards?
Regards,
Arnout

Signature · 6 lines

Arnout Vandecappelle                          arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect            +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind                                http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium           BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint:  7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF

Read the cover letter in its thread